Blooket vs Kahoot: I Hosted Live Games on Both (2026)

Generate engaging quizzes in seconds

Start Free

Teachers keep asking the same question: Blooket or Kahoot!? Both run live quiz games that a class joins with a short code, and on paper they sound identical.

They are not. I created one five-question quiz, loaded it into each platform, hosted a live game on each, and played every game as a student from a second screen. Kahoot puts the question on the big screen and rewards the fastest correct answer. Blooket puts the question on each player's own screen, rewards correct answers with random prizes, and offers 18 different game modes. The free plans are far apart too: 60 players on Blooket, 40 on Kahoot's school plan, 15 on its work plan.

Below is what each one does well, what the free tiers hold back, and which one fits your room.

The short version

Pick Blooket if:

• You do not want to pay. A free Blooket game takes 60 players and includes 13 game modes, with no time limit. Kahoot's free plans stop at 40 or 15 players.
• Your class is bored of quiz shows. Right answers earn random chests and gold, so the fastest students do not win every game.
• You do not have a projector. The whole question shows on each player's own screen, so the game works in any room, or from home.
• You want to set quiz homework. Any quiz becomes a homework game with a link and a QR code, free for up to 14 days.
• You want the results as a file. The free report downloads as a spreadsheet.

Pick Kahoot if:

• You want the classic big-screen game. Question on the projector, music playing, podium at the end. Most classes already know it.
• You need more question types. Kahoot has sliders, puzzles, type-the-answer, polls and word clouds. Blooket only has multiple choice.
• You want AI to write the quiz. Give Kahoot a PDF, a topic, a link or a Wikipedia article and it writes the game. Blooket cannot do this itself.
• You run paid work events. Kahoot! 360 handles thousands of participants and adds slides, Q&A and surveys.
• You want ready-made quizzes. Kahoot's library is huge; one search returned 11,000 results.

How I compared Blooket and Kahoot

I tested the free plan of both platforms with the same five questions, hosting each live game from one tab and playing it from another. One note: my Kahoot account is registered as a work account, so where Kahoot showed me its business tier instead of the school one, I say so.

We build in this space as well. Coursebox is an AI-powered learning management system (LMS) whose AI quiz generator writes quiz questions from your documents, inside full courses with completion tracking. It is not one of the two tools here and it is not what I recommend below, so treat that as a disclosure rather than a pitch.

Blooket vs Kahoot at a glance

What you get on Blooket: more game for free, scored by luck

The test worked like this. I wrote the same five multiple-choice questions about warehouse safety (protective gear, lifting limits, forklifts, spills, fire assembly) into each platform's quiz editor, then hosted a live game on each and joined it as a player named TestLearner from a second browser tab. Everything below comes from those sessions.

Blooket's set creator offers four ways to get a quiz in:

• type the questions yourself
• import a set from Quizlet
• upload a CSV file
• hand the job to Khanmigo, the Khan Academy AI

I typed mine. The editor itself is simple: the question sits at the top, the four answer choices sit in coloured tiles below it, a tick marks the correct one, and each question carries its own timer.

Blooket's four ways in: type it, import from Quizlet, upload a CSV, or hand it to Khan Academy's AI.

The first safety question in Blooket's editor, with the green tick marking the correct tile.

Hosting starts with the most striking screen in the product: a full grid of 18 game modes, drawn like arcade titles, with names like Gold Quest, Fishing Frenzy, Cyber Hack, Tower Defense, Battle Royale and Racing. Five of the tiles carry a Plus-only tag, and every card prints its own difficulty, ideal time and player caps. Gold Quest, the default, takes 60 players free and 300 on Plus.

The game mode grid is Blooket's whole pitch; every card prints its free and Plus player caps.

The lobby shows a QR code, a join address (play.blooket.com) and a six-digit game ID. Players join with a nickname, and no player account is needed.

Blooket's lobby: a QR code and a six-digit game ID, no player accounts.

Before the game starts, each player gets assigned a "Blook", a cartoon avatar from a grid where most tiles are padlocked. The locked grid shows that Blooket is also a collecting game: playing earns tokens, tokens open boxes, and boxes hold rarer Blooks. My player got a common Seal.

The Blook picker before the game: my player got a common Seal; most of the grid is locked.

Then the quiz began, and the whole question appeared on my player screen: full text, four full answers, at my own pace. The host screen showed a leaderboard and a countdown instead. Blooket never needed the projector at all.

A Blooket question lands in full on the player's own screen, no projector needed.

A correct answer in Gold Quest does not earn points. It earns a pick from three treasure chests, and the chests are random: mine revealed "Take 25%", which steals a quarter of another player's gold, while other chests give flat gold or swap totals. A slow student who answers correctly can still take the lead from the fastest player, which keeps the whole room in the game. This is gamification doing a real job, not decoration: the randomness exists so that students who fall behind keep answering. With only one player joined, the steal chests displayed "No Players to Interact With"; the economy needs a full class.

A right answer in Gold Quest earns a chest pick, and the chests are random.

The game ends on a podium, and the player side keeps going: my TestLearner got a daily wheel spin for bonus tokens and progress on a "Class Pass" XP track. The collect-and-return economy runs even on teacher-hosted games, which is exactly why students open Blooket unprompted and why some schools block it.

Afterwards, the free report gave me an accuracy donut, totals, a per-student accuracy bar and a spreadsheet download. The per-question column, though, printed "?/?" with an upsell: question-level accuracy and answer distribution are Plus features.

Blooket's free report: donut, totals, per-student accuracy and a download; question detail is Plus.

Homework rounds it out: any set becomes a self-paced game behind a link and QR code, free for deadlines up to 14 days, with live progress updates. All of the above comes at no cost, and being the free one is the centre of Blooket's own pitch.

Where Blooket is better

1. The free tier. 60-player games, 13 modes, homework assignments and a report download at $0; Kahoot's free plans stop at 40 or 15 players.
2. Variety. 18 game modes against Kahoot's short list of experiences; the same quiz replays for weeks without feeling repeated.
3. Own-screen play. Full questions on player devices mean no projector, remote-friendly games and self-paced answering.
4. Kinder scoring. Luck-based rewards keep weaker quizzers in contention instead of cementing the fastest hands.
5. Cheaper paid tier. Plus costs $59.88 a year against Kahoot's school Gold at roughly four times that and work plans far beyond.

What you get on Kahoot: the classic quiz show, with tight free limits

The same five questions took a few more minutes on Kahoot, mostly because the creator kept offering to do the work for me. Kahoot's home screen leads with its AI panel: drag in a PDF of up to 150 pages, or point the generator at a topic, URL or Wikipedia article, and it drafts the kahoot. I chose the blank canvas for a fair test and typed the questions into the shape-and-colour tiles Kahoot invented. The editor even suggested Getty stock photos matched to my question text.

Kahoot's create menu: two of the five paths are AI generators.

The question-type menu is the widest in this category, and Kahoot groups it into three families:

• Test knowledge: quiz, true/false, type-answer, slider, pin-the-answer on an image, and puzzle ordering
• Collect opinions: polls, scales, word clouds, open-ended prompts and brainstorms
• Present: slide types for mixing teaching into the game

On my work account all of them were open; on the free school plan the public feature table lists quiz and true/false only.

The widest question-type menu in the category, from sliders and puzzles to word clouds.

Hosting starts with picking an "experience" (Classic, Teams, Accuracy, Confidence, or the presentation-flavoured Professional), and each card on my account printed the same ceiling: up to 15 participants. A second limit appeared the moment the game started: a 15-minute session countdown ticking in the header.

Kahoot's lobby: join at kahoot.it with the game PIN.

The game itself is the show everyone knows. My player joined at kahoot.it with a PIN and a nickname, no account. Then the classic split happened: the host screen carried the question and the four answers, while my player screen showed four blank coloured shapes and nothing else. In Kahoot's classic mode the game cannot run without a shared screen everyone can see.

The host screen carries the question and every answer...

...while the player holds four blank shapes; without the shared screen there is no game.

Scoring is pure speed. My first correct answer earned 913 points out of a possible 1,000, the number shrinking the longer I took, plus an answer-streak bonus for consecutive hits. Miss one and the screen consoles you ("We believe in you!"). It ends on the podium with confetti and, for the player, an "Unbeatable!" title. The presentation beats Blooket's: tighter music, cleaner transitions, and a format most classrooms have run for years.

913 of a possible 1,000 points: the faster the correct answer, the bigger the reward.

The podium after five questions: 3,682 points, 4 out of 5 correct.

The report afterwards had the same shape as Blooket's, with a stingier gate. Summary and per-player scores are free. Per-question accuracy showed for exactly three of my five questions; the last two sat blurred behind an Upgrade button, alongside blurred "Difficult questions", "Need help" and "Didn't finish" panels.

Kahoot's free report stops at question three; the rest hides behind an upgrade.

The upsell is constant. In one session, the same full-screen Kahoot! 360 Pro modal interrupted me three times, on save, on host and on assign, each time reciting my limits: "15-minute sessions for 15 participants."

The 360 Pro upsell that interrupted save, host and assign, quoting the 15-minute, 15-participant limits.

One thing Blooket cannot answer: reach. Kahoot's library search for "biology" returned 11,000 results including verified publisher channels (Marvel, Disney) and single sets with 825,000 plays, plus a paid content marketplace called AccessPass. On the work side, paid 360 tiers climb to 2,000 and even 5,000 participants per session, with slides, Q&A, surveys and NPS (net promoter score) polls built into the host flow. Blooket has no answer to any of that scale.

Where Kahoot is better

1. Question types. Sliders, puzzles, pins, type-answers, polls and word clouds against Blooket's multiple choice.
2. AI creation. A quiz from a PDF, topic, URL or Wikipedia page in one step; Blooket's AI route hands you to Khanmigo.
3. Polish. The pacing, sound and podium of the original quiz show, with none of Blooket's popup clutter.
4. The library and marketplace. 11,000 hits on one search, publisher channels, and paid premium content.
5. Pacing control. The shared screen moves the whole room through each question at the host's pace; Blooket's modes hand pacing to the players.
6. Scale when paid. Up to 5,000 participants, slide sync, Q&A and NPS on the 360 tiers; Blooket tops out at 300.

What they cost

Free is where Blooket and Kahoot differ most, so the examples come first:

Blooket pricing

Blooket's whole price list: free Starter, $4.99-a-month Plus charged yearly, $9.99 Flex.

Kahoot pricing

Kahoot sells three ladders, and which one you see depends on who you are:

What I wish I'd known before starting

• Blooket's per-question analytics are paid. The free report shows who scored what, but each question's accuracy prints "?/?" until you have Plus.
• Kahoot's free work plan is an evaluation plan. 15 participants, 15 minutes, and the countdown runs on screen during your game; the school free tier is the real free product.
• Blooket's steal mechanics need a crowd. With one or two players the chests literally report "No Players to Interact With"; the economy comes alive with a full class.
• Kahoot's upsell interrupts constantly. The same 360 Pro modal blocked save, host and assign in a single session.
• Blooket has no official mobile app. It runs in the browser on any device; Kahoot ships real iOS and Android apps for hosts and players.
• Kahoot's school free tier locks question types. Quiz and true/false only; the sliders, puzzles and word clouds on its brochure start on paid plans.
• Blooket's student economy is the hook and the distraction. Tokens, daily wheels and locked Blooks make students come back unprompted, and some schools block it for the same reason.
• Kahoot prices shift by region and audience. Three ladders, local currencies, frequent promos; the number your colleague quotes is probably from a different ladder than yours.

Where the class games stop, and what Coursebox adds

A quiz game is a moment. Blooket and Kahoot both make that moment loud and fun, and then the game ends and the learning record is a leaderboard screenshot. Reports are exactly where both free tiers squeeze hardest, and even the paid reports describe one game at a time, not whether a team is actually trained.

Our product picks up where the games leave off. Coursebox is an AI-powered LMS with a built-in quiz generator: give it the manual or slide deck your quiz came from and it writes the questions and wraps them in a full course, with AI grading for the answers that need marking. Completion and score records then persist per learner for as long as you need them. Tracking is not an upsell for us; it is the core job, and our usage numbers show how heavily that side of the product gets used.

For a live game in a classroom, though, the two tools above are the right choice. Coursebox is not built to run a class game. Pick your game, host it, and come back when someone asks you to prove the training happened.

The verdict, split by who is asking

Teaching a class on a budget of zero: Blooket. Sixty free seats, thirteen free modes, free homework games and a downloadable report beat everything on Kahoot's free ladders.

Teaching younger students, or a class tired of quiz shows: Blooket again. The luck-based scoring and the collectible Blooks were built for exactly this crowd.

Running the classic big-screen review game: Kahoot. The shared-screen show is the genre it invented, the pacing is still the best, and the 40-player free school cap covers most single classes.

Needing sliders, puzzles, polls or AI-written questions: Kahoot, on a paid school plan. Blooket's editor stops at multiple choice.

Running work training or large events: Kahoot! 360, priced per host and per audience size. Blooket tops out at 300 players and has no slides, Q&A or survey layer.

Training a team and needing proof it happened: neither; this is the job we built Coursebox for. A game is not a training record, so you want the quiz inside a course with completion tracking, which is what Coursebox generates from your documents.

If neither one fits

Blooket and Kahoot share their category with two siblings that come up in the same decision: Gimkit, whose modes play like Blooket's with heavier strategy and team mechanics, and Quizizz, which leans toward self-paced quizzes and homework.

If the live-game format itself is the problem, the gamification tools list covers platforms that build lasting game mechanics into training, and the AI quiz generators list ranks tools that write the quiz questions for you.

Last updated 1 September 2026. Both platforms were driven hands-on that day with the same five-question quiz, live games were hosted and played on each, and every price and player cap was read from the products or the vendors' own pricing pages on that date.